History, 22.12.2020 21:10 kenishawilkinsoy4mgw

worst religion in your opinion gove reasons please(don't say all religions or respect others beliefs or something like that) I really need help on this question I can't find anything bad please help

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: Jazzystith

not mine but

Definitely Christianity(including Catholicism), with the following reasons: they betrayed the Jews after stealing their Old Testament and used a Jesus(makes no difference whether he existed or not) with Buddhism knowledge and even fought among themselves killing each other(they killed the founder of their younger brother Mormonism as well as trying to get rid of Islam their own sister religion).

The following are some evidence especially the first 4 that proved their founders knew their God is fake:

20 IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE that proved Bible God is likely FAKE, don't miss the last paragraph that explains them all:

1) A creator god claimed to be all mighty should be the oldest and only religion but all the pagans, Greek, Chinese, Hinduism religions existed earlier. This proved their Creator claim fake.

2) Jesus similarities with Buddha. Maya to Mary, miracle pregnancy to virgin pregnancy, birth during a journey home to from home, prophesied soon after birth, both had a disciple who betrayed them, walked on water, Gautama left the palace at age 29 and Jesus appeared at 29, Gautama became Buddha at 35 and Jesus died and resurrected at around 35 too, Buddha had a big meal while Jesus had a last supper before they died, after they passed away, 500 arahants witnessed compilation of Buddha's teachings and over 500 witnesses to Jesus's resurrection etc. All coincidental ? Beside Buddha, Jesus also copied found to be copied from other figures. Surely they can't be ALL coincidental.

3) Many of the Bible's mythologies was copied from older pagans, Greek, Egyptian or Hinduism religions(note the names too) E.g. Adam & Eve from Atman and Jiva, in Hinduism, big flood and survivor Noah/3 sons same as Manu/3 sons although cause of flood is different. Even the names of Abraham and wife/sister Sarah close to Brahma and Saraswathi beside having quite similar story. Regardless of which religion copied which, it proved this god is NOT the only true god or all mighty as it doesn't makes sense to create or allow more copies or religions.

4) Why should a true all mighty and all knowing allowed their people to branch off and kill their parent religion Judaism ? "Free will" as an excuse is not acceptable as earlier they claimed their God killed all people with a big flood(without freewill) because they sinned.

5) The way they collect titlings during Sunday mass is so tricky. They know people will be shy not to pay or tend to pay more when others could be watching. This is why they don't just use a stationed money box like Buddhism, Hinduism or Chinese temples where people can donate anytime. Catholics and Islam made it even bigger by suggesting donation of a certain percentage of their income.

6) The Bible condemned non-followers, clearly mentioned in Mark's words. Why should a Creator God's religion condemn non-believers when in the first place, they claimed their God created the world? Isn't this like playing both sides of the same coin, both good and evil ?

7)Not knowing why or how the world exists don't mean that it was created by a god. Now "Creator" idea got stale, they use "Intelligent Design" What is so intelligent in its design? If people don't need to go to toilet and don't have unpleasant feelings and sufferings, then I will call it an intelligent design.

8)Wisdom and meditation are not taught by them because they know meditation can make a person's mind clearer and wiser.

9)The Bible copied very much from older religions but not the theory of karma because karma idea defeats the purpose of the mighty God trick and it will prevent people from doing bad deeds.

10) The way the church preached and claimed simply lacked substance and logic. If you ask them intelligent question, they will always be evasive and say you are not serious or an evil.

ill put the other reasons in the comments btw

Explanation:

to the guy who said islam- no they dont I've studied it if u know anything about religion you'd think otherwise

Answer from: Quest

woodrow wilsons and the treaty signed between france britain and italy

Answer from: Quest

enhanced benefits or fringe benefits are supplementary additions employers offer to employees in addition to their wages. these benefits, both monetary and non-monetary are offered to boost employee morale. benefits

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 16:30

1) the french and indian war was a smaller war that was a part of what larger european war? 2) what was the first direct tax placed on the colonies by the british government? 3) how did the stamp act affect the prices of goods? 4) what happened to the stamp act as a result of colonist protest, boycotts, and the stamp act congress?

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 19:30

In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 21:00

Which of the following areas borders the pacific ocean and has a mediterranean-style climate? a. british columbia b. northern oregon c. southern california d. southern washington

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 01:00

The soviet union and the united states believed in two very different economic systems. what were the names of each?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

worst religion in your opinion gove reasons please(don't say all religions or respect others beliefs...

Questions