1)'The treaties at the end of the First World War were certainly not fair but then there was no possibility that they could have been fair.' To what extent do you agree with this judgement?

2)What were the aims of Woodrow Wilson, Lloyd George and Georges Clemenceau (the Big
Three) at the Paris Peace Conference?

3)To what extent were the aims of the Big Three achieved at the Paris Peace Conference?

Help these questions are a disaster to my life°×°

The relationship between countries after the First World War.

Explanation:

1.) The above statement has many omissions. The situation could have been much more favorable if at least France and Great Britain had given in to their efforts in part. Germany is not the only culprit for World War I. The administration headed by the American president knew that, and they insisted on the potential in the negotiations of the winning countries, but France and Britain did not give in.

2.) Woodward Wilson and his administration intended to implement President Wilson's so-called 14 points. The most important detail of that document was the League of Nations' formation to seeking peace in the world. Because of his efforts, President Wilson will receive the Nobel Peace Prize in 1920.

3.) Wilson and his administration did not achieve their goals at the Paris Conference. Most of the victorious countries sought to seize as many war reparations as possible from the defeated countries. Therefore, the United States delegation withdrew from the conference and later signed a peace agreement with each country individually.

while it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton.

explanation:

before eli whitney's invention of the cotton gin, picking and cleaning cotton was a slow, labor-intensive job. workers, usually slaves, had to pick the seeds from the cotton fibers by hand. this invention made it possible to grow large amounts of cotton on big farms and make money.