What are the critics that define a barbarian for the Greek and Roman world? Please help me, I've been working on it for several days. Thanks in advance

The people who defined what a Barbarian was in the Ancient Greek and Roman world were the Roman and Greek intellectuals, who each considered their own culture to be most superior culture in the world at the time, and who looked down on other cultures.

Explanation:

People like Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle (Greeks), or Seneca, Cicero, and Tacitus (Romans) deemed to be "Barbarians" all those peoples who did not belong to either Greek or Roman civilization, and they wrote books that supported these views. The common people simply took these views at face value and did not reflect too much on them, since most people at the time were illiterate in first place.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

d. china

good luck

d is the best choice