Without the French and Indian War, could the colonies have joined together to fight the Revolutionary War?

I think that they would because even without the French and Indian war colonists had certain grievances towards the government, that didn't respected their rights as British subjects.

Explanation:

French and Indian war increased the dissatisfaction of the colonists as new taxes were imposed, including the Tea Act, Townshend acts and many other. But, even before this measures Britain had imposed many laws and taxes that were not easily accepted in the colonies. Therefore, even without the French and Indian War the colonies  would show their dissatisfaction.

3. republican abraham lincoln

4. south carolina

5. charleston, south carolina

6. confederates

7. minie bullet - made defense even safer, it spun faster, traveled further and was five times more accurate than any single-man weapon. able to kill at half a mile, it was the largest contributor to battle wounds

      or the the gatling gun - the most successful of several rapid-fire guns that were born before the war. its efficiency in killing only made war more deadly.

idk which one u learned about. pick one.

8. the south was fighting to maintain its way of life, whereas the north was fighting to maintain a union. so they had will, and the north were fighing on unfamiliar territory

9. union had the large population, people to fight in the war and work in the factories to make war materials, industrial base, the factories to make these war materials. the union also was wealthier than the confederacy and could finance the war.

10. stonewall jackson

11. chancellorsville

12. gettysburg

13. sherman

some of these might be wrong but i tried my best.   : )