T. M. v. State of Florida I, (your name), write this opinion to (support the majority opinion or dissent with the majority opinion) on the case of T. M. v. State of Florida.

(First paragraph–Explain why your opinion reflects the majority or minority opinion. Give details of each side of the case.)

(Second paragraph–Explain whether you tended to favor loose or strict interpretation of the laws and rights in this case. Give specific examples of where you used each type of interpretation in this case. Explain your reasons for favoring one or the other.)

(Third paragraph–Describe the factors that most influenced your decision and interpretations in this case. Explain why you thought each was significant.)

several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. the sherman antitrust act was based on the constitutional power of congress to regulate interstate commerce.

you answered my friends question just to get the coins you didn't even give a valid response.

both eastern and western early north american cultures were known for building wigwams and longhouses.

wigwams, also called wetus, were small houses of 8-10 feet tall, made of wooden frames covered with woven mats and sheets that were used by algonquian indians. similarly,   longhouses were also used by algonquian and the iroquois tribes, and they were built as well with pole frames and elm bark covering. however, the main difference between wigwams and longhouses is that the latter was much larger than the former, with 200 feet long, 20 feet wide, and 20 feet high with inner raised platforms used for sleeping space.

ththis should be under spanish