Help plz! history assignment on creating a constitution. correct and meaningful answers!!

Federalists

Dear Editor,

I would like to inform my Ratification of the Constitution on my perspective of the Federalists. The Federalists happened to make an argument on that the Constitution would create a strong National Government. Also, the Federalists wanted someone who was able to support a strong Central Government. The Federalist's were able to recall the weaknesses of the Government under the Articles of Confederation. In Conclusion, The Federalists want someone who is determined and set good standards.

Anti-Federalists

Dear Editor,

I would like to inform my Ratification of the Constitution on my perspective of the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists are "against" a strong Central Government(Anti New Constitution). Anti-Federalists are afraid the National Government would become to powerful. Lastly, The Anti-Federalists want a Bill of Rights to be added to protect individual rights. In Conclusion, The Anti-Federalist are against following examples of the National Government because they want everything for "every-man-for-himself."

Explanation:

social contract theory basically says that all individuals are born equal, and provided a god given right to consent to be governed. american government is based of this

thomas hobbes and john locke said that we are selfish, individualistic, and constantly at war with each other, therefore we need to be controlled. 

government is defined as the legitimate use of force to control human behavior within territorial boundaries, here comes in hobbes and locke.

hobbes takes the part about controlling human behavior. while locke takes the part of legitimate use of force, since force is not legitimate unless there is consent of the people. 

there are basically 3 goals of the government: 1) maintain order by protecting life and property. 2) providing public goods, those which are typically not provided by the public sector, such as roads and education. 3) promote equality be it political, opportunist or outcome equality. 

1. the townshend acts of 1767 “threaten the country with poverty and ruin.”

at a town meeting held at faneuil hall in boston on october 28, 1767, boston freeholders and residents discussed the implications of the brutal townshend acts levied against the colonists. the townshend acts were a set of four acts passed by the british parliament in the summer of 1767 in order to generate revenue for the crown (through duties on goods such as lead, glass, paper, and tea) as well as exert british control over the increasingly rebellious colonists.

during the oct. 28 meeting, the bostonians found:

the excessive use of foreign superfluities is the chief cause of the present distressed state of this town, as it is thereby drained of its money: which misfortune is likely to be increased by means of the late additional burthens and impositions on the trade of the province, which threaten the country with poverty and ruin.

as a result, the citizens unanimously voted to boycott all british-made goods.