Compare and contrast the differing opinions of nation-states in regards to expansion or control of colonial territories, specifically Prussian interests in Alsace and British interests in Ireland.

guys we are the human of this earth I want to say god bless y’all all this app is mad goated!

Explanation:

As the four major European powers (Britain, Prussia, Russia and Austria) opposing the French Empire in the Napoleonic Wars saw Napoleon's power collapsing in 1814, they started planning for the postwar world. The Treaty of Chaumont of March 1814 reaffirmed decisions that had been made already and which would be ratified by the more important Congress of Vienna of 1814–15. They included the establishment of a confederated Germany including both Austria and Prussia (plus the Czech lands), the division of French protectorates and annexations into independent states, the restoration of the Bourbon kings of Spain, the enlargement of the Netherlands to include what in 1830 became modern Belgium, and the continuation of British subsidies to its allies. The Treaty of Chaumont united the powers to defeat Napoleon and became the cornerstone of the Concert of Europe, which formed the balance of power for the next two decades.[3][4]

One goal of diplomacy throughout the period was to achieve a "balance of power", so that no one or two powers would be dominant.[5] If one power gained an advantage—for example by winning a war and acquiring new territory—its rivals might seek "compensation"—that is, territorial or other gains, even though they were not part of the war in the first place. The bystander might be angry if the winner of the war did not provide enough compensation. For example, in 1866, Prussia and supporting north German States defeated Austria and its southern German allies, but France was angry that it did not get any compensation to balance off the Prussian gains.[6]

Explanation:

c

explanation:

the answer is "focused on"

lol gave an answer 1 week that's the answer for those who need it in the future xd