What were some Cause of the Missouri Compromise and effects?

The Missouri Compromise of 1820, while repealed just 30 years later, is a benchmark ... The rush, effectively led to massacre known as Bleeding Kansas

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise of 1820, while repealed just 30 years later, is a benchmark moment in United States history. A bill created with the idea of finding peace and a solution to an ever-growing debate, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would perpetuate the tensions and debates revolving around the hot-button issue of slavery for years to come.  

The exchange of Missouri as a slave state in favor of the ban of slavery north of the 36-30 line and a free Maine was just a temporary solution to the problem. Southerners believed federal regulation of slavery was unconstitutional and to impose a restriction on the instituion of slavery was out of their jurisdiction. Northerners saw the deal as a way to keep the score even and keep the current state of the nation at bay. It was clear that both regions saw the compromise as unjust or unfair to their own side.

Just 30 years later, the debates repeated itself in the form of Kansas and Nebraska. The Missouri Compromise was struck down as unconstitutional, and slavery and anti-slavery proponents rushed into the territory to vote in favor or against the practice. The rush, effectively led to massacre known as Bleeding Kansas and propelled itself into the very real beginnings of the American Civil War.

Explanation:

as general terms,  indian territory,  the indian territories, or  indian country  describe an evolving land area set aside by the  united states government  for the relocation of  native americans  who held  aboriginal title  to their land. in general, the tribes ceded land they occupied in exchange for  land grants  in 1803. the concept of an indian territory was an outcome of the 18th- and 19th-century policy of  indian removal. after the  civil war(1861–1865), the policy of the government was one of  assimilation.