George W. Bush delivered his "9/11 Address" less than 8 hours after the attacks were made in New York City and Washington, DC. He did not use a lot of specific details as proof in his speech. Do you think he should have included specific details of the attacks and the damages done as proof in his speech, or was it reasonable to leave it broad and general?

1) which is an example of active listening during a formal discussion the answer is d. responding to questions this proves that you were actively listening to the conversation being held in the discussion and that you also know about the topic being discussed2) finding the right balance in a formal discussion is primarily the answer is a. being activeyou want to actively take part of the discussion and prove that you are focused. able to understand what others are saying and make your own input