Discussion Topic This unit covers the removal of Native American tribes to Indian Territory. Today, we judge the methods used by the US government harshly, believing that the forced relocation of these tribes was wrong. Some historians believe that using present-day ideas about right and wrong to judge the past makes it more difficult to understand history. This idea is known as presentism.

What do you think? Do you agree that the values of today can't be compared with the values from another era? Or do you think that what is right and wrong today still applies to the actions of people in history?

(I need a whole paragraph will give brainliest if you answer correctly)

answer: the purpose of the "index of forbidden books" was to prevent the contamination of the faith or the corruption of morals of roman catholics according to canon law, through the reading of theologically mistaken or immoral books. the condemnation of published books, thus listed in the index librorum prohibitorum.

explanation: index librorum prohibitorum, (latin: “index of forbidden books”), list of books once forbidden by roman catholic church authority as dangerous to the faith or morals of roman catholics. publication of the list ceased in 1966, and it was relegated to the status of a historic document.

the 20th and final edition appeared in 1948, and the index was formally abolished on 14 june 1966 by pope paul vi. the aim of the list was to protect the faith and morals of the faithful by putting a stop to the reading of theologically, culturally, and politically disruptive books.

the debate held in 1980 by carter and reagan was decisive for the elections. while carter tried to convince people that reagan was a "war hawk", reagan put all his efforts in showing the necessity to take care about medicare and the social security advantage. this debate reagan to win the elections