Historia sobre la historia de la administracion y sus asistentes o apoyos en colomnia ydesde cuando el sena ofrece este programa y el perfil de salida del asistente administrativo

La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.

Vamos a ubicar a historia de la administración en Colombia desde su etapa moderna y su incursión en las currículas escolares. De lo contario sería muy extenso retomar la historia desde la época prehispánica y precolombina.

El programa académico de Administración empezó a ser parte de los programas educativos en Colombia a partir de los años 60. Distintos programas desarrollaron tópicos en Administración, pero con la Ley 60 de 1981, la Administración de Empresas se reconocía como una profesión o carrera profesional.

Durante años, muchos profesionistas en Contaduría habían hecho carreras en los Bancos Colombianos, y de ahí salieron maestros que apoyaron el desarrollo de la Administración como carrera.

El perfil del egresado de Administración en Colombia busca ser un entendido de la práctica administrativa y organizacional, que domine los principales funciones administrativas y sea sensible a las necesidades delos recursos humanos como factor esencial en el manejo de la empresa moderna.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

"globalization has greatly impacted the united states and american citizens. first and foremost, globalization has spread american influence throughout the world. globalization has opened up more markets for the united states, which in effect american companies sell their products worldwide. there has been a rise of multinational corporations and their influence has greatly increased."