(HELP ASAP) (WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT) How was Julius Caesar’s rule different from the rule of earlier Roman leaders? SELECT ALL THAT APPLY.

Caesar’s rule was meant to be permanent, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was meant to be temporary. Caesar’s rule was meant to be permanent, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was meant to be temporary. , ,

Caesar’s rule was supported by other government members, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was not supported by government members. Caesar’s rule was supported by other government members, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was not supported by government members. , ,

Caesar’s rule was viewed as a threat to democracy, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was not seen as a threat. Caesar’s rule was viewed as a threat to democracy, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was not seen as a threat. , ,

Caesar’s rule was regarded negatively by the Roman people, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was regarded more positively.