When deciding cases, justices often look to precedent, or previously decided court cases and opinions that can serve as a guide for interpreting the law. Which of the following court cases could possibly have been a precedent used to decide Berkemer v. McCarty (1984) Miranda v. Arizona (1966) United States v. Garibay (1998) Dickerson v. United States (2000) Missouri v. Seibert (2004) ​

peasants’ war, (1524–25) peasant uprising in germany inspired by changes brought by the reformation, peasants in western and southern germany invoked   divine law to demand agrarian rights and freedom from oppression by nobles and landlords. as the uprising spread, some peasant groups organized armies. although the revolt was supported huldrych zwingli and thomas müntzerits condemnation by martain luther contributed to its defeat, principally by the army of the swabian league. some 100,000 peasants were killed. reprisals and increased restrictions discouraged further attempts to improve the peasants’ plight.

i think it would be " a" i might be wrong tho

can you tell me all of statements so i can answer this for you.

until then have a great week.

                                  : }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }

1. yes it was the new deal introduced lots of regulations to workers, such as the national labour relations act of 1935 which workers to form unions and protected the members from other laws as well as forcing businesses to listen to the unions and their workers

2.the new deal had a lot of great ideas. but when fdr created the national industrial recovery act. they set prizes and work hours for the workers. the workers made more money ($.40 rather than $.20) but because they did not work as much they would end up making less money. after a while the supreme court found this act to be un-constitutional. but sense the people weren’t   making as much money they could not afford the products. even though the new deal was taken away in 1939 because the government became to powerful, there are still remnants of it in our government. national labor relations, social security, etc… the new deal alone did not end the depression but it the u.s.a dramatically and set them on the right track to recover and become the powerhouse of a country it is today.

3. yes it did bring some relief to those who were willing and able to work and it assisted in terms of creating new and strengthening existing infrastructure.  

4.

they met to talk about what type of government they wanted and how best to go about creating that republican government.