During the Age of Exploration, Europeans began to colonize other parts of the world to increase their wealth and power. Colonization occurs when one nation takes complete control of the people of another nation or region. Do you think Europeans were right to colonize other people? Consider their world view at that time compared to our own. Is there some way the Europeans could have achieved their goals without colonizing other people?

according to me the colonization of the Europeans was not r8 because as they wanted to increase their income they totally destroyed civilisations and culture by using the people as slaves for their plantations and human trafficking. if they had done the colonization on this period they won't stay a chance at the policys of UN. they could have done it by establishing trade with the people and promoting peace

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation: