What role did economics play in the fall of the Roman Empire? Money in Rome was too easy to lose or steal because it consisted of small silver coins.

The Roman economy became too focused on wealth by conquest, and not enough on production.

The best jobs in Rome were being taken by Barbarian and Gothic immigrants.

Romans were not willing to spend money on the needs of their military.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

1. i forgot 2. he was gay 3. they killed a lot of the population 6. they rode horses and had swords we have guns and tanks

me on my last question.