subject
History, 25.02.2021 23:50 sadcoasta

In Schmerber v. California, the Court said that a search warrant was not necessary because . the rights of the individual take precedence over public safety

the suspect’s privacy rights cannot be violated

the officer did not have time to secure a warrant

the suspect’s blood was drawn in a safe way

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:00
Japanese americans being relocated to internment camps were given very little notice and could only take there clothes and a few small possessions. true or false
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 16:30
During the 1920s, which president atoped a laissez-faire toward business, which bring about great depression
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:50
Kennedy singles out one group of countries that the united states will defend against any attacker what countries are they
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Mississippi, florida, alabama, georgia, louisiana, and texas all seceded from the union. true or false ?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In Schmerber v. California, the Court said that a search warrant was not necessary because . the ri...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 01.08.2019 00:30
Questions on the website: 13722363