subject
History, 03.03.2021 23:50 sirinapadeangel

Some people believe that the post-war trials were just a performance but that there wasn’t any real justice meted out at Nuremburg or elsewhere. Particularly, many people charge that the German post-war trials were too lenient on accused Nazis. Do you think the trials should have been handled differently? What could have been a better option for prosecuting war criminals? Do you think that all Nazi soldiers simply by virtue of being members of the army of the Third Reich, should have been prosecuted for war crimes? What else could have been done to punish the guilty? What should the international community do to make sure such events don’t happen again?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:40
The date a source was created is considered part of its historical context intended audience purpose point of view
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
The northwest ordinance guaranteed three rights for the settlers of the northwest territory. what were they?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
Which of these factors could have influenced the sacco and vanzetti case? check all that apply a. prejudice or distrust toward immigrants b. fear or anarchist violence c. distrust of those who did not seem to fully support the government
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:20
Who was the last of the "good empire" a: commodus c: marcus aurelius b: trajan d: julius caesar
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Some people believe that the post-war trials were just a performance but that there wasn’t any real...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.09.2020 20:01
question
Mathematics, 02.09.2020 20:01
question
Computers and Technology, 02.09.2020 20:01
Questions on the website: 13722361