Step 1: –10 + 8x < 6x – 4 Step 2: –10 < –2x – 4
Step 3: –6 < –2x
Step 4:

What is the final step in solving the inequality –2(5 – 4x) < 6x – 4?

x < –3
x > –3
x < 3
x > 3

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

el caso marbury contra madison (5 u.s. 137 1870) es un proceso judicial abordado ante la corte suprema de los estados unidos y resuelto en 1803. el mismo surgió como resultado de una querella política a raíz de las elecciones presidenciales de 1800, en las que thomas jefferson, quien era un republicano demócrata, derrotó al entonces presidente john adams, el cual era federalista. en los últimos días del gobierno saliente de adams, el congreso, dominado por los federalistas, estableció una serie de cargos judiciales, entre ellos 42 jueces de paz para el distrito de columbia. el senado confirmó los nombramientos, el presidente los firmó y el secretario de estado estaba encargado de sellar y entregar las actas de nombramiento. en el ajetreo de última hora, el secretario de estado saliente no entregó las actas de nombramiento a