History, 09.03.2021 07:50 joshualoz5414

PLEASE HEL Instructions: Your job is to write a first person letter as if you were a soldier who participated in the D-Day invasion during World War II. You are going to write a BEFORE the invasion letter and an AFTER the invasion letter. Your letter needs to be
addressed to a family member who lives back in your home country. The first letter will be about the progress of World War
II and the plans for D-Day. The second letter will be about your experiences during D-Day, your survival and victory.
Location
= Beaches of Normandy France under the control of Nazi Germany
Countries Involved = United States + Great Britain + France + Australia vs. Germany
Things to think about for the 1st
Letter
Describe how much of Europe
was controlled by Germany.
Describe where you are and
what you are going to do.
Describe the strategy behind
the D-Day invasion?
Describe the risk that is
involved.
Explain why D-Day is so
important and why it is worth
the risk.
End the letter by what the
person should do if you don't
make it out alive.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 16:30

What was the difference between marx view of communism and the actual implementation in russia? a. there was no difference between the marxist communism and russian communism. c. marxist view was not interested in the government controlling business while in russia, everything was controlled by the government b. marxist view was focused more on economic control while russia focused on taking complete controlled of everything. d. marxist view believed that the government controlled everything without questions while russia moved more towards a mixed economy.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 17:30

What was an immediate result for japan after world war i? a. a boosted economy b. a slower economy c. a weakened military d. less territory controlled by japan

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 05:00

Wiiy is limportant to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation? o a. a conclusion that does not consider context is a generalization rather than an interpretation. b. historical interpretations are not valid if they are written in a similar context as the event. o c. every historical interpretation must consider the long-term consequences of an event. o d. the setting of an event can provide insight into why it happened.

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 07:00

What is one aspect of an interpretation of literature

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

PLEASE HEL Instructions: Your job is to write a first person letter as if you were a soldier who par...

Questions