subject
History, 10.03.2021 04:10 alexisbarry7495

The statement below is from a U. S. Supreme Court decision. "A person who is a resident of a loyal State, where he was arrested, who was never resident in any State engaged in rebellion, nor connected with the military or naval service, cannot be regarded as a prisoner of war."
Source: Ex parte Milligan (1866)

What constitutional safeguard does this passage describe?Immersive Reader

writ of certiorari

habeas corpus

ex post facto

stare decisis

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:00
Some historians argue that the changes brought by industrialization caused americans to beomce a more secular people. to what extent do you agree or disagree, and why? use evidence from chapter 18 to make your case.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
Following archduke franz ferdinand's assassination, austro-hungarian leaders: a. aided the ottoman empire in its campaign to keep serbia under its control. b. executed nearly all prominent serbs living in austria-hungary c. threatened to invade serbia if serb leaders did not agree to a set of strict demands. d.. formed an alliance with great britain to protect austria-hungary from future attacks.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
What project establish leonardo da vincis reputation as a creative and talented engineer
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:50
Compare and contrast the civil rights act of 1964 and the civil rights act of 1991
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The statement below is from a U. S. Supreme Court decision. "A person who is a resident of a loyal...
Questions
question
Biology, 26.02.2021 04:40
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 04:40
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 04:40
Questions on the website: 13722361