How did the Supreme Court rule in the Bush v. Gore decision in 2000? A. It ruled that there was not enough time to hold another recount.
B. It ruled that Al Gore had no grounds to challenge the recount
C. It ruled that George W. Bush had no grounds to challenge the recount.
D. It ruled that, despite being flawed, the recount was still valid.

Answer is in the photo. I couldn't attach it here, but uploaded it to a file hosting. link below! Good Luck!

cutt.ly/XzW3SUN

the answer is b: the religion they practice.

here's why:

there were many different native american tribes and those with similar characteristics formed a main tribe or nation. each had its own language, religion and customs.

a.

congress passed laws allowing for free passage between states.