In Korematsu v. United States (1944), the federal exclusion order that forced Japanese Americans into relocation camps was deemed constitutional because it was issued under .

Answer is in the photo. I couldn't attach it here, but uploaded it to a file hosting. link below! Good Luck!

cutt.ly/wzUiVyK

A. wartime condition.

Explanation:

The Korematsu v. the United States case of 1944 was a landmark decision taken by the Supreme Court justifying and supporting the military decision to 'intern' Japanese-American citizens. This executive order was a result of the attack of Pearl Harbor by Japanese forces, which led America to take any American citizen of Japanese descent to "voluntary internment".

When Executive Order number 34 came, Fred Korematsu, a citizen of Japanese-American descent refused to comply with the internment. He was arrested on charges of violation of military orders. But even though he brought the case to the court, the court upheld the federal decision as constitutional.

The argument by Justice Hugo L. Black was that ". . . under conditions of modern warfare, our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger."

Thus, the correct answer is option A.

Wartime Conditions

Explanation:

your answer will be b. improving roads, bridges, and other infrastructure. hope i !

a agree i agree becuase it is very importnat for example it can tlel you about your past for exmaple   the first culture was the semerians which people are sitll tryignt o uncover there secrets the wall is just anohter treasure that has thousnads of secrets in it to be uncovered