According to McKinley, why couldn't the US allow Europe to take control over the Philippines back? Of Mckinley's four reason for annexation, which do you think appeals to his audience (at the time of this speech) the most and why?

pls help I need help on these 2 questions!​

The US wanted to become an empire so they wanted to expand more. The united states said they felt as though the Filipinos were incapable of self rule and if the US did not take over control of the Philippines they might lose their chance to a different power to collect their power and wealth

Explanation:

I Read about it

the catholic church withhold people's access to the bible during the middle ages.

people could go to church and listen to the teachings, but it was absolutely forbidden to own and/or read the books of both the old and new testaments. it was also prohibited to translate the books (which where originally in biblical hebrew) to any other language.

this was done so the church could remain in control of what their teachings were and to enhance their importance and power, while also being able to judge people's actions through information that was unavailable for the general public.

both eastern and western early north american cultures were known for building wigwams and longhouses.

wigwams, also called wetus, were small houses of 8-10 feet tall, made of wooden frames covered with woven mats and sheets that were used by algonquian indians. similarly,   longhouses were also used by algonquian and the iroquois tribes, and they were built as well with pole frames and elm bark covering. however, the main difference between wigwams and longhouses is that the latter was much larger than the former, with 200 feet long, 20 feet wide, and 20 feet high with inner raised platforms used for sleeping space.