Why are environmental problems common in developing countries?

a. the citizens of developing countries have not been educated about the dangers of pollution and the need to protect resources.

b. people in developing countries travel long distances by car to get to work and school, leading to air pollution and habitat destruction.

c. rapid growth of new industries and technology has led to an enormous increase in environmental woes in developing countries.

d. developing countries often specialize in manufacturing and providing raw materials, which can seriously harm the environment.

The answer is D according to E2020. The reasoning behind the answer is if we look at countries like India or china (developing) they burn lots of oil and use lots of manufacturing techniques that are not strictly mandated in favor of preserving the environment. This causes destruction and pollution, like smog.

D: Developing countries often specialize in manufacturing and providing raw materials, which can seriously harm the environment.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is