An automotive service center would like feedback on its customer service. Each customer receives a printed card after they pay for services with a short survey on which customer service is ranked on a scale from 1 (least
satisfied) to 5 (most satisfied) Customers can then choose to submit the card in a box on their way out of the store.
The store manager finds that 140 cards were filled out in the past week, with an average customer satisfaction
score of 2.47. Which type of bias is most likely to be present in the survey results?
This is undercoverage bias because some types of customers may not have received cards.
This is nonresponse bias because many customers may choose to not fill out the cards.
This is question wording bias because the customer service score levels may not be clear to customers.
O This is response bias because customers may not be truthful about their experience with customer service,
ANSWER ASAP UNIT TEST ON EDG

an example of japanese imperial rule that was evident when it placed restrictions on korean rights was that. it assumed control of newspapers and free speech.

unit test review 2 flashcards | quizlet

an example of japanese imperial rule that was evident when it placed restrictions on korean rights was that. it assumed control of newspapers and free speech.

an example of japanese imperial rule that was evident when it placed

› high school › history

2 answers

jun 7, 2016 - an example of japanese imperial rule that was evident when it placed restrictions on korean rights was that. it took away all guns. it squelched nationalist groups. it assumed control of the government.

explanation:

the covenant that god made with abraham was a unilateral (one-sided) promise from god to abraham.   apart from anything abraham did, god was promising that he was going to bring about a great nation from abraham's offspring, and that the messiah (meaning "the anointed one") would come from abraham's descendants, as one through whom the whole world would receive favor from god.   as god promised abraham, "through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed" (genesis 22: 18).

the "new covenant" was announced by jesus of nazareth, who had asserted that he was the "son of david" (and descendant of abraham) that fulfilled those promises to abraham.   when jesus introduced the sacred meal that we now refer to as the lord's supper, as told his disciples in reference to the wine they drank, "this cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you" (luke 22: 20).   this "new covenant" through jesus was also a unilateral (one-sided) covenant.   he gave himself in sacrifice for all people, without conditions attached.   as his friend and apostle john later wrote, "he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 john 2: 2).

so the covenant with abraham and the "new covenant" ushered in by jesus are, in essence, connected as one covenant -- because jesus was saying he was the one promised to abraham that fulfilled that covenant and brought blessing to the world.