3. In the context of the text, how does fear drive action? How did fear contribute to the
decisions of countries to turn refugees away? Cite evidence from this text, your own
experience, and other literature, art, or history in your answer.

4.
In the context of the text, what are the effects of prejudice? What role did prejudice play in
some countries' immigration policies? What role does prejudice play today in immigration
policies? Cite evidence from this text, your own experience, and other literature, art, or
history in your answer.
6

realmente cosas malas! ¡la explicación está abajo, para más recursos siga el enlace!

  en la francia revolucionaria, la asamblea legislativa vota para abolir la monarquía y establecer la primera república. la medida se produjo un año después de que el rey luis xvi aprobara a regañadientes una nueva constitución que lo despojó de gran parte de su poder.

aquí está el enlace: https: //

espero que esto te ayude, pero solo para hacerte saber, el sitio web no está en español. si quieres que lo traduzca solo tienes que preguntar.

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

is this a question? put a question ?