how does the moon fit into the discussion of sustainable ecosystems? how will its disappearance influence ecosystems

1. The brightest and largest object in our night sky, the Moon makes Earth a more livable planet by moderating our home planet's wobble on its axis, leading to a relatively stable climate. It also causes tides, creating a rhythm that has guided humans for thousands of years. The moon's gravity pulls at the Earth, causing predictable rises and falls in sea levels known as tides. ... Low tides occur between these two humps. The pull of the moon is also slowing the Earth's rotation, an effect known as tidal braking, which increases the length of our day by 2.3 milliseconds per century.The Earth's axis is tilted at 23.5 degrees from the ecliptic. That angle is responsible for the seasons. ... The moon's gravitational pull on the Earth causes precession -- a small, 21,000-year cyclic change in the angle of the Earth's tilt.

2. Earth's oceans would have much smaller tides - about one-third the size of what they are now. Tides churn up material in the oceans, which allows coastal ecosystems to thrive. ... Temperatures could potentially be more extreme on the Earth without this influence.It is the pull of the Moon's gravity on the Earth that holds our planet in place. Without the Moon stabilising our tilt, it is possible that the Earth's tilt could vary wildly. It would move from no tilt (which means no seasons) to a large tilt (which means extreme weather and even ice ages).

Explanation:

this below paragraph might give even more info ...but not that necessary lol

In theory, the light of a full Moon might disrupt people's sleep, which could influence their mood. Anne Wirz-Justice, a chronobiologist at the Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Switzerland, describes Wehr's data on this relationship between lunar and manic-depressive cycles as “believable” but “complex” .

STREAM DYNAMITE AND LIFE GOES ON ARMYYY!!!

BOROHAE SARANGAEEE

♡♡♡♡♡♡¡¡¡¡¡

your answer will be b. improving roads, bridges, and other infrastructure. hope i !

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!