I trust that we strongly agree with Dr. King's stand, while we find Governor Wallace's views very alien and wrong. However, let's be cool and detached historians and dissect both arguments. What kind of moral arguments they make for and against integration and equality? What are the legal, philosophical, and ethical foundations of their thinking?

According to marx, which of the following would be the main characteristic of communism? a. a community which work was shared and property was owned in common b. a classless society in which wealth and power were equally shared c. a society in which the economy function without government interference d. an economy in which private individuals owned the means of production.

Match the vocabulary word with its meaning. 1. capitalism to change or improve something by correcting faults or removing abuses 2. chattel an economic system based on private ownership and competition motivated by profit 3. imperialism policy extending political, economic, or military rule over another 4. indentured an economic system where colonies supply goods to the mother country 5. mercantilism an agreement committing one person to be another's slave for a certain period of time 6. reform a type of slavery where the slave is the sole property of the master with no rights

What was unification difficult to accomplish in both germany and italy? a.) weaker states we’re attacked by stronger states for control of the emerging nations. b.) major european powers fought to keep independent states under their control. c.) germans and italians did not share common histories and languages.