Please help! NO LINKS, No fake answers, No fake photo links, no fake files. You will get reported. So please please please please help me. If you need points I’ll make a new question just for points. You would have to read the documents than answer the questions. Also you have to show one piece of evidence for each question. (it’s not a project, it is only two questions)

1- After reading document 1, what are some things Americans wanted in their homes once they got electricity (text evidence)? How did electricity affect spending habits & American life (own words)?

2- According to Document 2, is it possible for the American economy to survive if people keep buying on credit at the rate that they have been (text evidence)? What are the dangers of buying on credit (own words)?

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

(1)representation based on state population (2)all states have equal representation apex

i do not believe this was true indefiantly the native americans would have lsot aganist america one they didndt have the resources and allies that america had and 2   indians werent as advanced at the time as they were not 3 americans had the expreince because some of the soliders from other wars fought in that war and were attecked etc