Iwill make the first person who answers this !

scenario 2
state law recognizes that the owner of a vehicle is the person or company whose name appears on the title, or legal and official ownership document. the state also recognizes payment agreements that people and businesses make through official, legal means.
a young woman says her neighbor agreed to purchase her old car. she agreed to accept payments from him on a monthly basis until he paid off the car and trusted that he would honor this plan. she signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. she says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car.
the neighbor says he understood the car to be a gift and has no obligation to make payments. he did not sign an official agreement to make payments. he says that she gave him the car in exchange for his electric scooter, which is new and gets great gas mileage. the neighbor maintains she just wants the car back now that he fixed it and it looks better.
is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? how do you know?
is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? how do you know?
determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. use details from the scenario to support your answer.


do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? in other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? use details from the scenario to support your answer.

a) the colonists began to see themselves as different from people in britain.

african american women made meaningful gains in the labor force and us armed forces as a result of the wartime labor shortage during the second world war, but these advances were sharply circumscribed by racial segregation, which was legal in all parts of the country, and virulent racism in the dominant culture. president franklin roosevelt’s signing of executive order 8802 in 1941 banned race discrimination in defense industries and civil service jobs. it was rarely enforced, however, and mostly ignored by employers until they were forced to hire nonwhites by exhaustion of the white labor supply. even then, war industries often filled their most menial and dangerous positions with black employees, frequently on night shifts and in janitorial slots. african american women suffered both racial and gender discrimination, so they had to fight very hard even to enter skilled spots on the production line in aircraft, shipyard work, and other well-paying war industries.

entrenched racist attitudes on the part of white employers and coworkers in the nation’s war-production centers hindered black women’s ability to gain employment in these unionized blue-collar jobs. when black people did get hired, they often were forced to use separate restrooms and to perform the lowest paid, most difficult work. sometimes their employment triggered hate strikes, which erupted periodically over the war, when white workers walked off the job over promotion or hiring of african americans into previously restricted departments and occupation categories. in 1943, for example, a baltimore western electric plant was forced to build separate toilet facilities for white and black workers when white women demanded them. barred from most service occupations like telephone operator, clerical worker (other than federal offices in washington, dc), or waitress at white restaurants, black women mainly found war jobs in dangerous industries such as munitions plants.

african american women

the difficulty for black women entering skilled production areas, retail and other service work, or transportation jobs during the 1940s is mirrored in their continuing dominance of the private market for maids. although during the war, the proportion of african american women who were working in domestic service fell dramatically, from 60 to 44 percent, domestic employment remained their primary occupation category throughout the war. even in the military, which they did enter as a support for black male soldiers in the segregated armed forces, black women had trouble escaping low-skilled assignments, and they were not allowed to take combat roles. six african american wacs, for example, were court-martialed at fort devens, massachusetts, when they refused to take custodial assignments. in her memoir of being the first african american to join the women’s army corps, charity adams earley mentions the common army practice of dividing into "white" and "colored" the jobs wacs were given, with the latter being menial and

japans americans

japanese americans in military during world war ii in world war ii for its size and length of service, japanese americans served in the u.s. armed to nisei veterans in general—"most of the others did extremely well in their work and lives.

explanation:

sos