Which factors led to the decline and defeat of the inca empire? choose all answers that are correct. a. the spanish found many allies among the people the incas had conquered. b. the inca leader atahualpa was executed by the spanish. c. the inca did not have the modern weapons and firepower that the spanish did. d. the inca's extensive efforts to protect their leadership succeeded. e. disease brought by the spanish devastated the inca population.

Option: B. The Inca leader Atahualpa was executed by the Spanish.

     C. The Inca did not have the modern weapons and firepower that        the Spanish did.

     E. Disease brought by the Spanish devastated the Inca population.

Explanation:

The factors that led to the decline and defeat of the Inca Empire was the arrival of Spanish and diseases. After arriving in the New World, Spanish began to interact with natives. They not only trade goods but brought diseases that caused the death of many people because Natives Indians were not immune to fight it. Majority of the Native American died with coming connecting with chickenpox, cholera, smallpox, malaria,  scarlet fever, measles, etc. Inca Empire conquered by Spanish explorer Francisco Pizarro in 1532. Pizarro was able to seize the Inca civilization by killing  Inca Emperor Atahualpa. Incas weapons were not superior to steel blades, horses,  and canons which the Spanish soldiers used.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is