subject
History, 29.08.2019 07:20 mjasmine3280

In the dred scott case, the supreme court decided
a. the compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law.
b. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave of his or her freedom if they lived in the south.
c. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law.
d. the missouri compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in the slave states. v

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 20:30
This excerpt reveals that elinor is select all that apply
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
What happened in the tinker v des monies? and why is it important what happened in the hazlewood v. kuhlmeier? why is it important?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 12:30
How does mahanโ€™s thesis support the concept of manifest destiny
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:00
10. which one of the following provisions was part of the first draft of the articles of confederation submitted to the second continental congress but not in the final version? a. representation by states in government based on population b. a strong central government c. no right for the federal government to levy taxes d. government control over the unsettled western lands
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the dred scott case, the supreme court decided
a. the compromise of 1850 was illegal becau...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.03.2020 16:08
question
Health, 05.03.2020 16:09
question
Mathematics, 05.03.2020 16:09
question
Social Studies, 05.03.2020 16:10
Questions on the website: 13722360