How was the rebellion in spain different from that in italy?
a. the new spanish ruler seized power without popular support from citizens.
b. spain was not in economic or social turmoil when the rebellion occurred.
c. the spanish rebellion did not result in an authoritarian government.
d. spain’s military leaders did not fully support the new spanish ruler.

The correct answer is A) the new Spanish ruler seized power without popular support from the citizens.

The rebellion in Spain was different from the rebellion in Italy in that the new Spanish ruler seized power without popular support from the citizens.

General Francisco Franco was the leader of the Nationalist forces that overthrew the Republic during the Spanish Civil War of 1936 to 1939. After the victory, he became the Dictator of Spain until 1975.  

Benito Mussolini was the leader of the Fascist Party in Italy from 1922 to 1943. He was a charismatic leader that counted with the sympathy of many people in Italy. That was one of the differences with Francisco Franco. Indeed, the rebellion in Spain was different from the rebellion in Italy in that the new Spanish ruler seized power without popular support from the citizens.

idk

explanation:

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)