History, 17.09.2019 05:30 hallmansean04

Why is the miranda v. arizona case important?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

This case is very important, it established the miranda rights ("you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be held against you in a court of ") basically, it gave those accused the right to be silent, and have the option to not say anything that would self incriminate themselves. hence the term "pleading the 5th". the miranda rights also gave the option to appoint a lawyer to any person convicted if they cannot afford one, to give every person equal opportunity to plead their case to the best of ability.

in the case, miranda self incriminated himself, and confessed to a crime while in custody, but was not aware of his 5th amendment rights. so the case went to the supreme court, and miranda won the case, and stated that because he was not aware of his rights, his confession was invalid.

Answer from: Quest

Aman its you boy skinny pe pe
Which sentence form enrico fermi the italian navigator is not strictly factual

Answer from: Quest

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.

Another question on History

History, 22.06.2019 01:30

What reason did yurovsky give nicholas ii for his pending execution? the czar’s relatives were about to rescue the romanovs. nicholas had committed crimes against the russians. nicholas had misused his power to abuse his own people. nicholas had not lived up to his duties as czar of russia. the answers are not b and c, i already tried those.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 02:30

Write 3 paragraphs on why the us should not have annexed the philippines

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 05:30

Imagine you are a historian studying a battlefield journal written by a soldier serving in world war i. describe the process of interpreting the information within the journal, as well as how you would determine whether the evidence in the journal is valid

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 05:30

In what ways did the french revolution produce freedom? what were the limits of this freedom?