History, 27.01.2020 20:31 Misspaige5150

Read the excerpt from the state constitution of arkansas, which was adopted in 1874.

no person who may hereafter fight a duel, assist in the same as second, or send, accept, or knowingly carry a challenge therefor, shall hold any office in the state, for a period of ten
-arkansas state constitution, article 19, section

how would a rule like this most likely be interpreted by someone interested in state constitutional reform?
a. this rule would be seen as a fundamental law of lasting importance that should not be changed.
b. this rule would be seen as a statutory law that the state legislature should pass but not put in the constitution.
c. this rule would be seen as a miscellaneous provision that no longer has any practical effect and does not need to be in the constitution.
d. this rule would be seen as a preamble that has no legal force and could remain in the document to explain the constitution's purpose.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 18:00

What problem did the business leaders have with the roosevelt administration's policies? too much for tenant farmers not enough deficit spending too much deficit spending not enough for tenant farmers

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 22:30

Match the vocabulary word with its meaning. 1. capitalism to change or improve something by correcting faults or removing abuses 2. chattel an economic system based on private ownership and competition motivated by profit 3. imperialism policy extending political, economic, or military rule over another 4. indentured an economic system where colonies supply goods to the mother country 5. mercantilism an agreement committing one person to be another's slave for a certain period of time 6. reform a type of slavery where the slave is the sole property of the master with no rights

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 06:00

Can you summarize this? it takes time and caution to perfect anything which must be concealed. it takes time to crush men who are pursuing legitimate trade. but one of mr. rockefeller’s most impressive characteristics is patience. there never was a more patient man, or one who could dare more while he waited. the folly of hurrying, the folly of discouragement, for one who would succeed, went hand in hand. everything must be ready before he acted, but while you wait you must prepare, must think, work. "you must put in, if you would take out." his instinct for the money opportunity in things was amazing, his perception of the value of seizing this or that particular invention, plant, market, was unerring.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 07:00

Which of the following is an example of conflict between new england colonists and native americans? a.fundamental orders b.bacons rebellion c.english civil war d.king phillips war

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Read the excerpt from the state constitution of arkansas, which was adopted in 1874.

no...

Questions