History, 16.10.2019 16:00 zovav1oszg9z

What was the epidemic of "world lawlessness" that roosevelt referred in this speech

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: Khalifasmart21

His speech was about violating treaties on both the nazis and the french/english side

Answer from: 1UNIDENTIFIED1

FDR was talking about the Axis countries violating the treaties they had signed, particularly the Versailles Treaty. But he was also talking about the Japanese invasion of China in 1937 and the Italian invasion of Ethiopia in 1935. Therefore he “Quarantined”those countries and refused to sell them arms or materials for war making.

Answer from: Quest

the correct answer is to reduce tax

Answer from: Quest

because everyone tends to get their feelings hurt if they don't agree with something someone is doing and vice versa. it's a major issue that needs to be dealt with, especially in the christian society. everyone thinks that christians hate gay people, because it is a sin, and christians "just hate everyone who sins and every one is going to hell for sinning"(saying that all in a sarcastic tone but i'm just going to go ahead and tell you why everything with that type of view on christians is wrong.

#1. christians do not hate gay people. and if they do, then that is their own personal problem. christians are not supposed to hate anyone. if you hate a neighbor (or any person basically), then that is as if you are hating jesus.

#2. being gay is in fact a sin according to the holy bible. it is in genesis. and no, the fact that it is a sin, does not mean that god hates you. he is grieved that a person is sinning against his word, but he still loves that person. in fact, christians are supposed to love everyone. we are supposed to love our enemies, but hate the sin they are doing. we love you and respect you, but we do not agree with every decision you make, is basically what i'm trying to say.

hope this you ! (:

Another question on History

History, 22.06.2019 04:30

Which character of government describes athens not sparta?

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 05:50

30 in 1566 the i belonged to spain. ii rebelled against spanish rule. iii was in independent country. iv was made up of both catholic and protestant provinces.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 08:50

Write about 50 words explaining whether or not this passage supports that explanation.in the introduction, you heard genghis khan’s explanation of why the mongols were successful conquerors in his time. the mongols were illiterate . . and perhaps no more than 700,000 in number. . they were herdsmen on the grassy plains north of the gobi desert, south of siberia’s forests. before the year 1200, the mongols were fragmented, moving about in small bands headed by a chief, or khan, and living in portable felt dwellings. the mongols endured frequent deprivations [hardships] and sparse areas for grazing their animals. they frequently fought over turf, and during hard times, they occasionally raided, interested in goods rather than bloodshed.

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 09:30

What advantages did the ming dynasty gain from the land it controlled?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

What was the epidemic of "world lawlessness" that roosevelt referred in this speech...

Questions