Plzz

what was the final ruling in the dred scott case in the u. s. supreme court?
a. under federal law, dred scott was no longer a slave because he had lived in a free state and a free territory
b. under federal law, dred scott was still a slave since he moved back to missouri, which was a slave state
c. under missouri law, dred scott was still a slave, despite having lived in a free state and a free territory
d. under missouri law, dred scott was not a slave since he gained his freedom by having lived in a free state and a free territory

Which statement in the passage best reflects sumer's opinion of the dred scott decision? a."i speak what cannot be denied." b."[the] judgment was sustained by a falsification of history." b."the opinion was more thoroughly abominable than anything history." i speak what cannot be denied when i declare that the opinion of the chief justice in the case of dred scott was more thoroughly abominable than anything of the kind in the history of courts. judicial baseness reached its lowest point on that occasion. you have not forgotten that terrible decision where a most unrighteous judgment was sustained by a falsification of history. -charles sumner, 1865

Plz me in 1756 george washington was sent on a mission to, a. build a fort at the point where the allegheny and monogahela rivers form the ohio river. b. attack the french at fort duquesne. c. attack the french at fort neccessity. d. deliver a message to the french demanding that they leave the ohio valley.

Who had the idea that there should be 3 branches of government