History, 27.08.2019 15:30 mprjug6

How did descartes and kepler contribute to the new scientific thinking?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: khynia11

2. The Church was invested in the idea that the Earth was at the center of the universe.

3. He knew that the planets revolved, but he did not believe they revolved around the earth
4. They showed how mathematics and measurement could be used in scientific investigation

5. He published On the Structure of the Human Body which became the foundation of modern anatomy.

6. Newton's book argued that mathematical principles could be applied to our understanding of the natural world.

7. Ptolemy's system no longer seemed to work with what scientists were observing, and scientists began to look for other theories.

8. Scientists shifted from thinking about the world to trying to understand how it functioned

9. Renaissance thinkers encouraged individuals to question how things work, and scientists began to test these ideas with experiments during the Scientific Revolution.1. He noticed that everything in the natural world had mathematical properties, and they could be used to study and measure everything.

hope this help

Answer from: ajime

they showed how mathematics and measurement could be used in scientific investigation

Answer from: Quest

latin america is a region of racial and cultural diversity. it is a group of countries and dependencies in the americas where romance languages are predominant. the term originated in 19th century france as amérique latine to consider french-speaking territories in the americas along with the larger group of countries where spanish and portuguese languages prevailed.

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 16:30

According to nationalists, a nation-states government should be a. controlled by european monarchs b. led by an appointment president c. voted on by european parliaments d. chosen by that nation-state

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 21:00

Which british general is in charge of the war effort in the south

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 22:30

What was charles townshends development of a crop rotation system important to the industrial revelotion

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 02:30

Which is not characteristic of capitalism? a) market e-commerce b) supply and demand c) freedom of competition d) a society without social classes