What best describes the impact of people changing from hunter-gatherers to living in permanent agricultural societies?

a.)hunter-gatherers relied on a narrower variety of foods compared to grain producing agricultural societies.

b.) hunter-gatherers made little impact on the land versus “slash and burn” techniques used by agricultural societies.

c.) hunter-gatherers domesticated more animals during the winter months compared to agricultural societies.

d.) hunter-gatherers endangered many species due to overkilling compared to agricultural societies.

B.) Hunter-gatherers made little impact on the land versus “slash and burn” techniques used by agricultural societies.

Explanation:

Although not all civilizations used the "slash and burn" method, it is fair to say that in general, hunter-gatherers made little impact on the land when compared to agricultural societies. Hunter-gatherers could only use the resources that were naturally present in an area. If these were exhausted, they had to relocate. This gave nature the change to recover before more people came again. In this way, the balance of life was maintained and very little impact on the environment was made by humans.

answer: i think it might be the last one

explanation:

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.