Suppose you have read two different books on world war ll, and each book has different arguments about how the war started. which of the following best describes the stronger historical argument? a. the argument that was written most recently b. the argument with the most reliable cited sources c. the argument that has the most sources d. the argument that does not use any electronic sources.

B. The argument with the most reliable cited sources

Explanation:

The argument with the most reliable sources would be the one that you must trust the most, since different books can defend and propose different arguments you should trust the one that has the most reliable cited sources in order to find the one that is more precise and objective.

the dust bowl, otherwise known as the dirty thirties, was a huge dust storm that killed multiple (and i mean  multiple) farmer's crops, leaving them homeless, and foodless, and jobless. in california, there were 5.7 million residents, and the population shrank as mexicans were repatriated. however, when the dustbowl happened, a lot of people began to move to california. by 1940, 250,000 people had arrived. therefore, your answer would be  the population increased, massively.  i hope this !

explanation: