In 1839, a group of africans took control of a spanish ship called la amistad that was bound for a port in cuba where the africans were to be sold as slaves. after seizing the ship, the africans demanded to be taken back to their homeland, but were tricked by the ship's navigator who set a course that took them along the coast of north america. la amistad was eventually captured by the united states navy, and the africans were held as pirates. though they were almost taken to be sold in a u. s. slave market, a court case arose regarding whether they could actually be considered slaves. abolitionists came to the aid of the africans, and the case eventually reached the supreme court in 1841.
which of the following best explains the result of the case above?
the men were considered slaves because slavery was legal in the u. s. at that time.
the men were considered free because u. s. did not have diplomatic relations with cuba.
the men were considered slaves since they were thought to be the property of spain.
the men were considered free since the atlantic slave trade had been illegal since 1793.

The correct answer is:

The men were considered free since the Atlantic slave trade had been illegal since 1793.

Explanation:

The ship was going along the bank of Cuba on its way to a port for re-closeout of the slaves. The African prisoners, who had been abducted in the zone of Sierra Leone in West Africa and wrongfully sold into subjugation and dispatched to Cuba, got away from their shackles and assumed control over the ship. They murdered the commander and the cook; two other group individuals got away in a raft.

The Africans guided the two Spanish navigator survivors to return them to Africa. The group deceived them, cruising north around evening time. La Amistad was later secured close Long Island, New York, by the United States Revenue Cutter Service (1790 ancestor before 1915 of the advanced U.S. Coast Guard) and arrested.

because everyone tends to get their feelings hurt if they don't agree with something someone is doing and vice versa. it's a major issue that needs to be dealt with, especially in the christian society. everyone thinks that christians hate gay people, because it is a sin, and christians "just hate everyone who sins and every one is going to hell for sinning"(saying that all in a sarcastic tone but i'm just going to go ahead and tell you why everything with that type of view on christians is wrong.

#1. christians do not hate gay people. and if they do, then that is their own personal problem. christians are not supposed to hate anyone. if you hate a neighbor (or any person basically), then that is as if you are hating jesus.

#2. being gay is in fact a sin according to the holy bible. it is in genesis. and no, the fact that it is a sin, does not mean that god hates you. he is grieved that a person is sinning against his word, but he still loves that person. in fact, christians are supposed to love everyone. we are supposed to love our enemies, but hate the sin they are doing. we love you and respect you, but we do not agree with every decision you make, is basically what i'm trying to say.

hope this you ! (: