Which best describes the effects of the conflict between brutus and cassius?

it elevates brutus as the only noble man.

it suggests that antony will soon invade sardis.

cassius is now the man who knows what's best for rome.

brutus appears extremely paranoid, even insane.

The option that best describes the effects of the conflict betweem Brutus and Cassius is option A. It elevates Brutus as the only noble man.

Brutus emerges as the most complex character in Julius Caesar and is also the play's tragic hero. He is a powerful public figure, but he is also depicted as a husband, a master to his servants, a dignified military leader, and a loving friend.

Meanwhile, Cassius is a manipulative man who uses Brutus's good nature and character to destroy the life of Julius Caesar.

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

he was in office from 1929 to 1933 and served as a reform governor, promoting programs to combat the economic crisis besetting the united states at the time. in the 1932 presidential election, roosevelt defeated republican president herbert hoover in a landslide.

explanation: