subject
History, 31.01.2020 11:59 daltonbrown4

In 1832, the united states supreme court ruled in worcester v. georgia that the state of georgia had no right to force the cherokee from their native lands. why did this ruling have little positive effect? georgia had no interest in cherokee lands. president jackson did not enforce the ruling. the cherokee nation chose to move to canada. the trail of tears had already occurred.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
How was the declaration of the rights of man similar to and different from the declaration of independence
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:20
How does eurydice slipping back into the underworld support the theme
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
Brainliestttme : )] -how is terrorism different from traditional warfare?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:30
Who were the 3 main opponents of the new deal and what were their concerns
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In 1832, the united states supreme court ruled in worcester v. georgia that the state of georgia had...
Questions
question
Physics, 24.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2020 01:01
question
Spanish, 24.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2020 01:01
Questions on the website: 13722359