In katz v. united states, the supreme court ruled on whether police could tap a public phone without a warrant. identify one way in which the case is legally significant.

a. it determined the legal status of phone booths.
b. it established the idea of a reasonable expectation of privacy.
c. it led to new laws on who could issue warrants.
d. it increased the power of the supreme court.

answer by yourhope:

the speaker of which statement would be best served by joining an interest group?

i want politicians to make more of an effort for lgbt rights!

: )

age 7 i learned how to ride a bike and skinned my knee

age 10 went on my first vacation to the beach

age 12 got in a car accident with my mom she got whiplash

age 14 i got my first pet and named it ripley

age 16 i got my my first car and it was blue

age 17 got my first job at target

explanation: