subject
History, 17.09.2019 02:30 SkyeShadow525

There is a public debate between the three candidates for the u. s. senate. during the debate, the topics of oil and energy are addressed. each candidate expressed their view on the issue:
edgar eisenhower:
"we need to cut our dependence on foreign oil. instead, let's use the natural world around us. think about the sun, wind, water, the heat of the earth, and the crops in our fields. these will make for affordable energy in the 21st century. we should fund research in those areas. let us also increase tax credits for private investment in clean, renewable sources of energy."
rebecca roosevelt:
"we need to cut our dependence on foreign oil and develop a national energy strategy. we should provide tax incentives for producing energy in the u. s. let's increase u. s. supplies of coal, oil, and natural gas. we should promote environmentally responsible exploration and development of oil and gas reserves. that includes federal land like alaska's national wildlife refuge. let's also advance clean coal technology."
terrance taft:
"looking at our energy supply is one thing—how we're using it is another. we can drive smaller, more fuel efficient cars. we can invest in more efficient technology for our homes and businesses. these things add up and make a big difference. in fact, in several new buildings associated with taft inc., we address our energy needs with locally produced renewable energy. that wouldn't be possible if we were using outdated, energy guzzling technology."
often politicians will agree that something is a priority, but have very different recommendations on how to best address it. what would be the best example of this from the previous section?
1. both terrance taft and edgar eisenhower agree that inefficiency is bad, but disagree on how to make things more efficient.
2. both rebecca roosevelt and edgar eisenhower agree that we need to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, but disagree on the best way of doing so.
3. both terrance taft and rebecca roosevelt agree that alternative energy is important, but disagree about which form would be the best to invest in.
4. both rebecca roosevelt and terrance taft agree that developing alternative energy sources is important, but differ on the best way of doing so.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:40
2. what was the significance of the british reform act of 1832? members of the middle class were permitted to run for parliament. members of the working class demanded and received better living conditions. voters were given the right to vote by secret ballot, farm workers, factory workers, and women were given the right to vote.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Did the both the us and ussr have atomic weapons after 1949
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Enlightenment thinkers most contributed to the development of whichpolitical idea? a. religious leaders should play the largest role in establishing asociety's laws.b. democratic governments have the responsibility to protect humanrights.c. criminals must be punished harshly if a society is to maintainorder.d. written constitutions place unnecessary restrictions ongovernments' powers.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:50
In 1956 , what country tried to break free of soviet control
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
There is a public debate between the three candidates for the u. s. senate. during the debate, the t...
Questions
question
History, 27.12.2019 18:31
Questions on the website: 13722362