Based on the excerpt, how did europeans justify settling on land that belonged to indigenous peoples?
"first, if it be unlawful: it must be so, either in respect of the law of god, or in regard to the laws of man. if in respect of god's law, (considering our primary end is to plant religion, our secondary and subalternate ends are for the honor and profit of our nation) i demand a resolution of this plain question: whether it be not a determined truth, that the gospel should be preached, to all the world . . [in] one of these three ways. .
the third belongs to us, who by way of merchandizing and trade, do buy of them the pearls of the earth, and sell to them the pearls of heaven, which action, if it be unlawful, it must proceed from one of these three grounds, either because we come to them, or trade with them, or tarry and dwell and possess part of their country against them."
—virginia company, "a true declaration of the estate in virginia," 1610
a. settling on lands owned by indigenous peoples would allow merchants and traders to more easily interact with those indigenous peoples and convert them to european religions.
b. settling on lands owned by indigenous peoples would ensure profits were earned for european nations if the indigenous peoples weren't open to preaching or trade.
c. settling on lands owned by indigenous peoples would cause the indigenous peoples to convert to european religions to prevent further loss of land.
d. settling on lands owned by indigenous peoples would demonstrate to the indigenous peoples that the profits of trade belong only to those who believe in european religions.

The correct answer is A) Settling on lands owned by indigenous peoples would allow merchants and traders to more easily interact with those indigenous peoples and convert them to European religions.

Based on the excerpt, Europeans justified settling on land that belonged to indigenous peoples in that "Settling on lands owned by indigenous peoples would allow merchants and traders to more easily interact with those indigenous peoples and convert them to European religions."

We are referring to a portion of the text called "A true declaration of the estate of the colony in Virginia with a confutation of such scandalous reports as haue tended to the disgrace of a so worthy an enterprise," by the Council of Virginia in 1610.

The Virginia-London Company had sponsored the trip to those Engils colonists that wanted to travel to the American territory to make those lands profitable and wanted to be rich. They arrived in 1607 and founded the colony of Jamestown, Virginia.  

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

the answer is b for brother