Imagine you are doing a report on the nuremberg trials. which primary source material would you analyze the issues that the nuremberg trials addressed?
diary of a jewish prisoner at auschwitz
military orders to kamikaze pilots before pearl harbor
recruitment poster featuring uncle sam
letter from a soldier at the battle of the bulge

If I were doing a report on the Nuremberg Trials, I would use a diary of a Jewish prisoner at Auschwitz as a primary source, as the Nuremberg Trials were related to Nazi crimes during World War II.

Explanation:

The Nuremberg Trials were a set of jurisdictional processes undertaken at the initiative of the victorious allied nations at the end of World War II, in which the responsibilities of leaders, officials and collaborators of the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler were determined and sanctioned in the different crimes and abuses against humanity committed in the name of the Third German Reich from September 1, 1939 until the fall of the regime in May 1945.

the great wall of china worked as a defense for the feudal states of the zhou dynasty to the north. during the warring states period more walls were put up to defend the borders of the different kingdoms. it was semi successful because despite the wall, the mongols eventually conquered china also the great wall provided protection to the economic development and cultural progress, safeguarded the trading routes such as the silk road, and secured transmission of information and transportation. @jayxboof

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: