How do european leaders respond to islamic expansion in the 700s ce?

-they initially rejected new religious leadership, but eventually embraced it.

-they were threatened by it and sought to stop it.

- they voted to give up certain lands to islamic leaders

-they initially embraced technological advances but eventually rejected them

The correct answer is B) they were threatened by it and sought to stop it.

European leaders responded to Islamic expansion in the 700s CE in that they were threatened by it and sought to stop it.

During the 700s, Muslims spread Islam in different parts of the world. By that time, Islam was spread through the Byzantine Empire, the Iberic Peninsula, Asia, and North Africa. Muslim used many trade routes to trade with other nations by land and also by sea because they also controlled routes in the Mediterranean Sea. Nonetheless, European nations tried to stop it because they had their own culture and religious beliefs and did not want Islam to be part of their lives.  

the andes or andean mountains (spanish: cordillera de los andes) are the longest continental mountain range in the world, forming a continuous highland along the western edge of south america. this range is about 7,000 km (4,300 mi) long, about 200 to 700 km (120 to 430 mi) wide (widest between 18° south and 20° south latitude), and of an average height of about 4,000 m (13,000 ft). the andes extend from north to south through seven south american countries: venezuela, colombia, ecuador, peru, bolivia, chile and argentina.

from wikipedia

hope this !

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!