What have the courts ruled about quotas as a part of affirmative action programs?

In past affirmative action programs, they rule out quotas in the court in means of having to provide of having benefits and prevent of having to gain failure such as having past failures. They have confirmed their usefulness in having to gain of correcting the past failures that they could achieve.

monarchy doesn’t have to have the hereditary element. there have been elective monarchies in the past where you choose your king-for-life and when he dies elect someone else for the job.

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3