2. Based on this rationale for a Supreme Court ruling, what was the government’s intended effect of interning people of Japanese ancestry during WWII? [1]

i believe it d) heterogeneous

just like you man, i personally think its either c or d

explanation:

but good luck with the test man

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

the answer is actually b.   as habitats are destroyed, animals and plants may become extinct.   , according to edge nuity